Green Berets of the Terror War

                                      By Dwayne Hunn

 

 

JFK proposed eradicating terrorists.  Few listened.  Few listen now.

 

Instead, terrorists kill Americans.  Americans kill back.  Terrorists paint Americans as spoiled, rich, empire seekers.  Americans see themselves as tough, barn-building, good neighbors.

 

Although our superb military must kill hardened terrorists, the side with the highest body counts will not be crowned winner.  The winner will notch in the world’s hearts and minds a picture of who Americans are.

 

A few fanatics launched this terror war, but the  dearth of visionary leadership planted its seeds. Our Military Corps alone can’t win this war.  It needs another Corp to rake away the seeds of war.

 

Had we implemented John Kennedy’s cost-effective vision, we would not have had 911, Patriot Act, a humongous budget deficit and spreading world hatred.  Would only a President rekindle the vision.

 

 And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you -- ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man."

In 1961 our 35th President’s invigorated the world.  Within a decade, even in Bombay’s slums, his picture adorned walls alongside those of Gandhi and Hindi Gods. 

Charisma alone didn’t captivate the world.  Admiration came from creative acts backing his energizing words.

From “… what together we can do for the freedom of man," Kennedy established the 1961 Peace Corps.  His vision was larger than the life infused into it.  The Peace Corps first Deputy Director, former U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania and former Director of Americorps, Harris Wofford, said Kennedy told him he:

“…wanted the Peace Corps to reach 100,000 a year. He said it would then be considered serious. In one decade, it would reach 1 million volunteers."

The Peace Corps first Director and Kennedy’s in-law, Sargent Shriver, saw the world as Kennedy did:

If the Pentagon’s map is more urgent, the Peace Corp’s is, perhaps, in the long run the most important... What happens in India, Africa, and South America -- whether the nations where the Peace Corps works succeed or not -- may well determine the balance of peace.

 

By  1963, with just two years of Corps’ successes around the world, Kennedy outlined his reasons for enlarging it in a Congressional letter, pointing out that emerging nations knew communism could never offer them optimum freedom.

Their aspirations for a free society are being stimulated by the presence of PCVs who have come not to usurp but to encourage the responsibility of local people and not to repress but to respect the individual characteristics and traditions of the local culture. “What is most remarkable about America,” wrote an American scholar, Philip S. Schadf, “is that over its confused diversity there broods a higher unity.” Because volunteers of different races and different religions nonetheless come from the same country, they represent the hope of building a community of free nations wherein each one, conscious of its rights and duties, will have regard for the welfare of all.

 

Earlier in 1963, while Viet Nam was the guerrilla war Kennedy accepted and not a massively deadly war, and before his calls for a million member Peace Corps were ignored, Kennedy was able to say, the Peace Corps:

“… constitute one third of all qualified secondary teachers in Sierra Leone, Ethiopia and Nyssaland; they have saved a three-quarter million dollar rice crop in Pakistan; they have vaccinated over 25,000 Bolivians; they are teaching in 400 Philippine schools; they have created a thriving poultry industry in the state of Punjab in India; they are teaching in every rural secondary school in British Honduras; they have contributed to the creation of a system of farm to market roads in Tanganyika. But these are only isolated examples.”

 

Note Kennedy’s words, when only 7,000 PCVs (Peace Corps Volunteers) were serving in 44 countries:

 

 “…they have saved a three-quarter million dollar rice crop in Pakistan…” 

 

And Shriver’s words:

 

“If the Pentagon’s map is more urgent, the Peace Corp’s is, perhaps, in the long run the most important...”

 

One hundred years before Kennedy, another great President said, “Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.” 

Now we are engaged in a great terrorist war, testing whether rogue, barbaric ideas can long endure. 

Today’s war is a civil war, testing how civilly people and nations will live.  Yet, in many ways, this long war rages because today’s budding Roman Empire has not marshaled the world’s resources against the indigenous enemy.

Have-not recruits man a chunk of terrorism’s army.  They are lead by narrow-minded elitists, who blame their recruits plight on the world’s dominant power and resource devourer.  The enemy’s recruits come from nations and peoples whom have-not -- had enough education, economic development, health care, women’s’ rights, healthy debate, protective justice.  Their fodder and leaders come from those whom have-not -- had enough exposure to the sterling characters of Americans, which almost always surpasses that of its government’s policies.

The Special Forces needed for this terrorist war? PCVs.

Cheaply, with stealthy silence and perfect aim, Peace Corps volunteers attack terrorists’ supply chains.  They are, as Shriver called them, the ”Punta de Lance” that slices and dices out terror’s heart.  The Corps walks lightly, speaks softly, but talks their talk, walks their walk, educates in their villages, creates dialogue not monologue, works together with what’s available to strengthen, not drain, local economies, undermines poverty that causes injustice, and strengthens institutions of justice that promotes fearless growth. 

In addition, veteran PCVs educate America on how much and how many generations are required to help other people build their own nations.  They are the world’s best intelligence gatherers and intelligence disseminators.  Too bad some in this administration didn’t expose themselves to at least that service and its education.

Sure, there’s evil, axis and otherwise.  Sure, we need the world’s toughest and best-prepared military. But, in the long run, America loses by just gutting and imprisoning bad guys.  In the long run, the world must believe that America is dedicated to teaching the world to fish, building thinking schools, and expanding nurturing homes – habitats for humanity; and not in intimidating the world with how much superior our bunker busters are than are their rifles. 

Today’s smart military leaders know this, as they try ‘nation building’ in an unprepared Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and many other nations.  But their well-intentioned goals are being overwhelmed by world hatred engendered by being forced to follow an uninformed, myopic policy.

 

A little history. 

After the U. S. supported dictatorial Trujillo regime was overthrown in the Dominican Republic in 1961, the Acting Foreign Minister pleaded that 450 Peace Corps volunteers be immediately sent to help build democratic institutions.  They weren’t.

Over the next few years a trio of governments came and went -- from former Trujillo family members to Juan Bosch to a governing civilian Triumvirate.

At the next uprising and 1965 American military intervention, there were 108 PCVs serving. Then Peace Corps Director, Jack Vaughn, met the former 1961 Acting Foreign Minister who said of the toppling of the embryonic democracy and successive failed governments: “If we had gotten those 450 volunteers (in 1961), this might not have happened.”

Democracies don’t happen overnight.  Powerful governments can’t just proclaim them.  Democracy starts as a seed, or as a child in a nurturing household.  Planted, it must be nurtured with education that promotes logic and debate, security that protects genders, classes and tribes, and decent housing that allows children and a middle class to grow with a sense of pride and drive.

In addition to the Corps, Kennedy created the Alliance for Progress as the economic answer to containing Cuba’s feared communism.  The tandem of a strong military, a “serious” Peace Corps, and Alliance for Progress addressed Kennedy’s vision of “together we could do for the freedom of man…” Infusing JFK’s PC vision would have produced a smarter world and reduced the need to manage today with smart bombs.

 

What’s happened?

When Kennedy said in the early 60’s, “There is not a place in the world that is not of concern to all of us…. We are responsible for the maintenance of freedom all over the world.”   He did not envision maintaining that freedom 40 years later by shipping our idealistic, high-teched soldiers and reservists along with off-budget mercenaries to 120 countries as targets for a growing clan of American haters.

What happened? 

After America stumbled through assassinations, dropped millions of tons of bombs on hundreds of thousands of little people, JFK’s vision of America’s Peace Army building a concern for “rights and duties” and “the welfare of all” was buried in an Asian quagmire.

Lacking JFK’s farsighted approach to world development, President Johnson appointed Thomas Mann, an advocate of business interests in Latin America, to head the Alliance.  Mann’s esteem for Latin Americans was:  "I know my Latinos. They understand only two things, a buck in the pocket and a kick in the ass."

LBJ then curbed the United States’ commitment to the Alliance, increasingly used military forces to suppress communist revolutions, and soon nullified the Good Neighbor Policy.

What’s happening today?

The administration that ushered in the 21st century ridiculed ‘nation building’, down zoned ‘alliance building’ and painted  ‘good neighbors’ and ‘progress’ in simplistic black or white.  Is today’s Texan Uncle Sam knowledgeable enough to know what is best for the world’s myriad colors, cultures, religions, interests and economies?

In 1992 today’s Deputy Defense Secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, and Cheney's Staff Chief, Lewis Libby, wrote the draft Defense Policy Guidance (DPG) paper. That DPG led to today’s Pax Americana policy  -- using America’s dominance to impose our military and economic desires on the world.

If Mann’s policy kicked Latinos in the butt, today’s Pax America is kicking America in a softer spot that is crushing the family’s jewels.

For much of the world, Pax America is Pox America, dumbly seasoned with American blood and dollars.

To protect our stressed middle class work force, their kids, their morals and world safety, America must quickly draft an overpowering Army.

 

The last time

The last time a PCV worked in Pakistan was 1967.  From 1961-67, 462 worked in agriculture, health and rural development in both East (now Bangladesh) and West Pakistan. 

The last time a PCV worked in Afghanistan was 1979.  From 1962-1979, 1,739 worked in education and health.

The last time a PCV worked in Iran was 1976.  From 1962-1976, 1,863 worked in agriculture, education and engineering. 

The last time a PCV served in troubled Haiti was February 2004.  From 1982 – 2003 approximately 500 worked in small business development, agricultural and environmental sustainability, and rural health education.

A PCV has never served in spheres of “evil”, such as Iraq, North Korea, Cuba or in tormented and seething Palestine and Israel. 

In all of North Africa and the Middle East, they have only served in Morocco and Jordan.

If you want to win the hearts of the troubled world, you must work their mean streets and arid fields.

Today’s Peace Corps has only 7,733 serving in 71 countries(1-2005).  In 2002 President Bush proposed doubling it over five years to rival its 1966 peak of 15,556. However, as Peace Corps Director Gaddi Vasquez says, “The rate of growth for the Peace Corps has slowed and will slow because the funding levels we requested for doubling have not materialized."

Since 1961, 178,000 have served (1-2005 + trainees), a long way from the yearly million-person Peace Army Kennedy wanted deployed by the 70’s.  During our Vietnam War years of 1965-74, 2,075 times as much was spent on the Pentagon’s map than on the Peace Corps. 

Each soldier in Vietnam cost taxpayers $149,661.  Each PCV cost $8,709.  Instead of sending 2,582,304 soldiers to Nam, we could have rolled the Viet Cong with 23,240,736 book-armed teachers, pitchforked ag experts, needle-wielding health workers could have hand-built a Mekong River Valley Power Authority that would have dwarfed our Tennessee Valley Authority.  The fog of war kills good answers.

Silly, pie-in-the-sky commentaries? 

If you are the planet’s strongest power, control its podium, and preach the Peace Corps vision over and over, people just won’t turn the other cheek.  In time people hear,  players come. And you don’t have to pay Americans much.  They love good service on difficult frontiers.  They like helping build their neighbor’s barn. 

A smart government can give Americans the thrill of service, teamwork, barn building, nation building, and world adventure without bleeding battlefields that multiply our enemies.

Preachy politicians too often lead by repeating their myopic policy proposals.  Even when flawed, it too often works for waging war.  Why not for peace?

Why not and when?

John Kennedy visualized saving the world from bloody fights against communism, or future ‘isms’, by building a massive Peace Corps.  Perhaps his vision grew from his favorite Edwin Markham poem: 

Why build these cities beautiful,             

If man unbuilded goes.             

In vain we build the world,             

Unless the builder also grows. 

 

 

Kennedy’s vision reverberated with the ‘Peaceful Warrior’ of his era: 

“I have a dream that one day  …”

                                     

 

And Martin Luther King warred for the same peaceful attack on virulent ‘isms’ during his 1964 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance:

I believe that even amid today's motor bursts and whining bullets, there is still hope for a brighter tomorrow. I believe that wounded justice, lying prostrate on the blood-flowing streets of our nations, can be lifted from this dust of shame to reign supreme among the children of men.

I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. I believe that what self-centered men have torn down, men other-centered can build up. I still believe that one day mankind will bow before the altars of God and be crowned triumphant over war and bloodshed, and nonviolent redemptive goodwill will proclaim the rule of the land.

"And the lion and the lamb shall lie down together and every man shall sit under his own vine and fig tree and none shall be afraid."

 

Three billion people – hungry, uneducated terrorist fodder -- subsist on $2.00 a day.   Smart bombs won’t deplete their ranks.  A million PCVs, sowing the Field of Better Dreams for “all of God’s children,” will. 

 

“To those peoples in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required…

 

“The energy, the faith and the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it, and the glow from that fire can truly light the world.”

 

        John Kennedy’s January 20, 1961 Inaugural Address

 

 

 

2475 words

Dwayne Hunn, Ph.D., served as a PCV in the slums of Mumbai (Bombay), India where many of the poor Marathi, Gujarati and Hindi would nod their knowing approval of JFK’s ‘Shanti Senna,’ or Peace Army.  In 1989, Congresswoman Boxer sponsored HR 1807 to carry Hunn’s proposal to form a Soviet-American Peace Corps.

 

 

More information on Dwayne Hunn, Ph.D., can be gleaned from his website www.dwaynehunn.hypermart.net   415-383-7880  attila@myexcel.com